MTHS Home Athletics & Activities Student Guide LIbrary Resources Classroom Activities Faculty & Staff Community Alumni Building Tech

The Discovery SchoolThe Innovation SchoolThe Renaissance SchoolTerrace Arts & Academics SchoolAchievement, Opportunity, and Service School

Welcome to Smaller Learning Communities at Mountlake Terrace High School
Frequently Asked Questions
Timelines
Small School Schedules
Why Small Schools?
Research
Why at MTHS?
Support Organizations

Grant Facts
Grant History

Decisions Made

 

Check out our newsletter!

October 2002

Why Small Schools at Mountlake Terrace High School?

Why Change?


Members of the Innovation School and a student meet to refine their plans.

Other Links:

Mountlake Terrace High School has chosen to reorganize into several small schools in order to improve the academic program for all students. The small schools program will positively impact a diverse range of students, including students struggling to earn credit, students performing at standard as well as the honor roll students. Though MTHS is far from a failing school, a variety of school data indicates MTHS must improve and the large body of current research reveals the small school structure is the most powerful tool for effecting this change.

Small Schools Research
Across the country, it has been demonstrated that students in small schools, regardless of ethnic background or social economic status, out perform their counterparts attending large comprehensive high schools. Restructuring High Schools for Equity and Excellence, by small schools researcher Valerie Lee, is one of the many studies that confirms the benefits of smalls schools in terms of academic performance. The study included 9,812 tenth through twelfth grade students over a period of three years in public and private schools. The student samples compared similarly to the demographic make up of MTHS students in terms of ethnicity and economic status. The study revealed that smaller schools with about 500 to 600 students significantly out-performed students in larger schools (1,200 students and more) in both math and reading. Researcher Lee remarks that schools engaged in restructuring practices for the purposes of creating smaller learning communities “really matter.” She found, “students learned more, and learning was more equitably distributed among students of different social backgrounds.”

Another recent study of small schools in Chicago, Small Schools: Great Strides, found students have better attendance rates, lower dropout rates, higher GPAs, fail fewer classes, and have higher achievement test scores. Other research indicates many small schools send a higher percentage of graduates to college than large comprehensive high schools.

Where Mountlake Terrace Can Improve
An examination of how our students perform academically shows MTHS can benefit from reorganizing into small schools. One area of concern has been our top students that have gone off to attend four year universities. The University of Washington has been tracking data on students who have attended our school and what happens to their GPAs when they arrive at the UW. Over the last decade, students from Mountlake Terrace who have attended the UW have had some of the most severe declines in their GPAs of almost any school in the entire Puget Sound area. This is especially concerning to us because the UW uses this
information as part of their admissions index and our students get penalized when they apply to the UW because of the poor performance over the past decade. We have also examined our SAT and ACT scores, our standardized test scores, and National Merit data in our analysis of our high performing students. Our national tests place us right at the 50th percentile and our SAT and ACT scores show that we are in a similar range. Furthermore, if you compare MTHS to schools with similar demographic populations, our students should be performing at a higher level. Despite having excellent teachers and students, we see a lot of room for academic improvement.

Based on our studies, the small school structure also shows the most promise for retaining and graduating all MTHS students. We have focused on this issue because our current drop out/retention rates show a need for improvement. For example, our graduating class of 2002 began ninth grade with approximately 516 students, but only 316 students received their diplomas in June. This particular trend has held steady for multiple years. There is a similar trend at the other large high schools as they have gotten larger as well. Educational research consistently shows small schools retain more students than large schools. For example, The Metropolitan Learning Center, a small high school in Portland, Oregon, has a drop out rate of two percent, while the rest of the district’s larger schools have a drop out rate of 30 percent. We see our reorganization as an excellent way to address the issue of retention and make a positive impact on our students.

Small Schools Create Communities of Thriving Learners
We seek to reinvent MTHS into smaller organizational units because it will produce the necessary conditions to profoundly affect all our students’ academic performance. Smaller schools will provide students and teachers the opportunity to form personalized, complex and challenging work. In the past, we asked students to bring their own coherence to their program, connect learning between classes, and to navigate a path through school that will meet their future plans all by themselves. The smaller learning communities have tremendous potential to bring this coherence together for all students and to thereby improve the academic performance for all students.